From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shields v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Aug 30, 2010
No. 4:10CV1598 AGF (E.D. Mo. Aug. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. 4:10CV1598 AGF.

August 30, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the motion of Eric Shields for leave to commence this action without prepayment of the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Upon consideration of the financial information provided with the motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff is financially unable to pay any portion of the filing fee. As a result, Plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Additionally, the Court has reviewed the complaint and will dismiss it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must dismiss a complaint filed in forma pauperis if the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. An action is frivolous if it "lacks an arguable basis in either law or fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989); Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992). An action is malicious if it is undertaken for the purpose of harassing the named defendants and not for the purpose of vindicating a cognizable right.Spencer v. Rhodes, 656 F. Supp. 458, 461-63 (E.D.N.C. 1987),aff'd 826 F.2d 1059 (4th Cir. 1987). A complaint fails to state a claim if it does not plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

Discussion

Plaintiff is a frequent filer of frivolous lawsuits. The instant complaint does not make sense and contains no facts that would entitle Plaintiff to relief. As a result, the Court will dismiss the action as legally frivolous.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint because the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both.

An appropriate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.


Summaries of

Shields v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Aug 30, 2010
No. 4:10CV1598 AGF (E.D. Mo. Aug. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Shields v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ERIC BERNARD SHIELDS, Plaintiff, v. MILLIE B. ADAMS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 30, 2010

Citations

No. 4:10CV1598 AGF (E.D. Mo. Aug. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

Sigsby v. Snyder

Therefore, his complaint is frivolous and must be dismissed. See Bell v. United States, No. 13-CV-05378, 2013…