From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shich v. Medicredit, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 22, 2015
Civil No.-JFM-15-1021 (D. Md. Jul. 22, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No.-JFM-15-1021

07-22-2015

SETH SHICH v. MEDICREDIT, INC.


MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff has filed this pro se action. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded to the motion to dismiss and has filed an amended complaint. Defendant's motion will be granted.

Plaintiff's amended complaint makes no allegations regarding activities performed by defendant in the District of Maryland. Indeed, in the original complaint plaintiff has made the rather remarkable allegation that "[a] substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim did not occur in any judicial district within Maryland." Nothing in the amended complaint expressly or implicitly contradicts this averment.

A separate order granting defendant's motion and dismissing this action without prejudice is being entered herewith. Date: 7/22/15

/s/_________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shich v. Medicredit, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 22, 2015
Civil No.-JFM-15-1021 (D. Md. Jul. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Shich v. Medicredit, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SETH SHICH v. MEDICREDIT, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Jul 22, 2015

Citations

Civil No.-JFM-15-1021 (D. Md. Jul. 22, 2015)

Citing Cases

Farmers' Lumber Co. v. Luikart

The construction placed upon the contract, by the signers, should prevail and appellant should not be…