Opinion
2:22-cv-00624 HCN DBP
05-09-2023
SHEN ENGINEERS, INC., a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD BRIGHTON, an individual, d/b/a BRIGHTON ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, Defendant.
Howard C. Nielson, Jr District Judge
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Shen Engineers, Inc. moves the court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 18.)The motion is timely, it was filed on the last day to file for amended pleadings, and there has been no opposition filed. Leave to amend is to be freely granted. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Aalco Construction Co. v. F. H. Linneman Construction Co., 399 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1968); Food Basket, Inc. v. Albertsons, Inc., 383 F.2d 785 (10th Cir. 1967). And the court finds no reason to deny Plaintiff's motion.
The case is referred from Judge Howard Nielson for consideration of all nondispositive pretrial matters under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). (ECF No. 14.)
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.