From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shells v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 17, 1983
309 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

66776.

DECIDED OCTOBER 17, 1983.

D. U. I., etc. Troup State Court. Before Judge Belcher.

James E. Weldon, for appellant.

Loeb C. Ketzky, Solicitor, for appellee.


This appeal is from appellant's conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol, leaving the scene of an accident, and failing to have liability insurance.

Appellant alleges that the prosecuting attorney, during closing argument, referred to the defendant's failure to testify. However, the transcript of the trial shows that appellant's counsel chose not to have the arguments of counsel recorded until after the allegedly prejudicial remark. "This court cannot consider asserted errors which are not supported by the record. [Cits.] There being no transcript of what the remarks were, we cannot consider this enumerated error." Mahar v. State, 137 Ga. App. 116, 117 ( 223 S.E.2d 204).

Defense counsel also objected to subsequent remarks of the prosecuting attorney concerning appellant's failure to produce witnesses to rebut the state's evidence. Those "remarks were permissible comments on the defense's failure to adduce evidence in rebuttal to the state's evidence. [Cits.]" Id.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 17, 1983.


Summaries of

Shells v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 17, 1983
309 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Shells v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHELLS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 17, 1983

Citations

309 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
168 Ga. App. 442

Citing Cases

Jackson v. State

As to the first matter, the record reveals and appellant in his brief acknowledges that defense counsel's…

Jackson v. Springfield

However, we need not further explain our reasoning because the record before us does not include…