From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 9, 2012
568 U.S. 1006 (2012)

Summary

granting certiorari on the question "[w]hether Congress' decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) ... violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution"

Summary of this case from Bethune-Hill v. Va. State Bd. of Elections

Opinion

No. 12–96.

11-09-2012

SHELBY COUNTY ALABAMA, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the following question: Whether Congress' decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.


Summaries of

Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 9, 2012
568 U.S. 1006 (2012)

granting certiorari on the question "[w]hether Congress' decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) ... violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution"

Summary of this case from Bethune-Hill v. Va. State Bd. of Elections
Case details for

Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:SHELBY COUNTY ALABAMA, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

568 U.S. 1006 (2012)
133 S. Ct. 594
184 L. Ed. 2d 389
81 U.S.L.W. 3064

Citing Cases

Bethune-Hill v. Va. State Bd. of Elections

See supra, at 804, and n. 2. Indeed, this Court has refused even to decide whether § 5 is constitutional,…