From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheffield v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 23, 2017
No. 72070 (Nev. App. Feb. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 72070

02-23-2017

TRAVIS SHEFFIELD, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS W. HERNDON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a purported order from the district court denying a pretrial motion to dismiss appointed counsel and appoint new counsel. Petitioner asserts his trial is scheduled for April 24, 2017, and he is being denied his right to effective counsel because his counsel fails to: communicate with him or discuss at length plausible options for a defense strategy; seek and obtain evidence to help prepare the declarants for trial; take investigative measures or use all available resources to obtain relevant material important to the case; file pre-trial motions; and investigate evidence that may mitigate or reduce his sentence.

Because petitioner can challenge the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss counsel on appeal in the event he is convicted, NRS 177.015(3); NRS 177.045, he has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and, therefore, this court's intervention by way of an extraordinary writ is not warranted, NRS 34.170. Petitioner has not pointed to any circumstances revealing urgency or strong necessity for this court to intervene even though there is an alternative remedy available. Cf. Salaiscooper v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 117 Ney. 892, 901-02, 34 P.3d 509, 515-16 (2001) (concluding that review through writ petition was warranted even though there was an alternative remedy where there were 56 similar cases with the same issues pending in lower courts and petition presented issue of great statewide importance). Therefore, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228-29, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004), and we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

Travis Sheffield

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Sheffield v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 23, 2017
No. 72070 (Nev. App. Feb. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Sheffield v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS SHEFFIELD, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

No. 72070 (Nev. App. Feb. 23, 2017)