From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheehan v. City & Cnty of S.F.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jul 14, 2015
793 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 11–16401.

07-14-2015

Teresa SHEEHAN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; Heather Fong, in her capacity as Chief of Police for the City and County of San Francisco; Kimberly Reynolds, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco; Katherine Holder, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants–Appellees.

John L. Burris, Esquire, Ayana Alyce Cuevas–Curry, The Law Offices of John L. Burris, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Peter Julian Keith, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants–Appellees.


John L. Burris, Esquire, Ayana Alyce Cuevas–Curry, The Law Offices of John L. Burris, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellant.

Peter Julian Keith, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants–Appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. 3:09–cv–03889–CRB.

Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, SUSAN P. GRABER and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In our previous opinion, Sheehan v. City & County of San Francisco, 743 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir.2014), we affirmed in part and vacated in part the judgment of the district court. In City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1765, 191 L.Ed.2d 856 (2015), the Supreme Court reversed our judgment in part and remanded to this court for further proceedings. Under these decisions, the district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants on Sheehan's Fourth Amendment claims but, as explained in Parts III and IV of our previous opinion, erred by granting summary judgment to the defendants on Sheehan's Americans with Disabilities Act and state law claims. We therefore affirm in part and vacate in part the judgment of the district court and remand to the district court for further proceedings. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Sheehan v. City & Cnty of S.F.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jul 14, 2015
793 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Sheehan v. City & Cnty of S.F.

Case Details

Full title:Teresa SHEEHAN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Jul 14, 2015

Citations

793 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. City of San Jose

The 9th Circuit subsequently affirmed its conclusion that the ADA applies to arrests. See Sheehan v. City &…

Montue v. City of San Diego

Turning to Plaintiff's ADA claim, it appears Plaintiff is attempting to allege a reasonable accommodation…