Opinion
No. 248 MAL 2016
09-13-2016
Diana SHEARER and Jeff Shearer, Petitioners v. Scott HAFER and Paulette Ford, Respondents
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW , this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:
a. Whether the Superior Court should be reversed because it erred in affirming the trial court's order granting [Respondents'] request for a protective order where Mrs. Shearer has the right to have counsel present and to audio record all portions of a defense neuropsychological examination pursuant to the clear language of Pa.R.C.P. 4010 [?]
b. Whether the Superior Court should be reversed because it erred in affirming the trial court's order granting [Respondents'] request for a protective order where Mrs. Shearer has the right to have counsel present and to audio record all portions of a defense neuropsychological examination and where [Respondents] have not shown good cause to justify stripping Mrs. Shearer of these protections granted to her under Pa.R.C.P. 4010 [?]
In addition to the issues framed by Petitioners, the parties are directed to address the following question:
Whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the appeal was properly before it under the collateral order doctrine of Pa.R.A.P. 313 ?