Summary
reversing grant of severance where the nature and extent of the plaintiff's injuries were needed to show causal connection between the incident and the injury
Summary of this case from Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Opinion
583
March 26, 2002.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J. and a jury), entered February 6, 2001, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff building resident when she was scalded by hot water while taking a shower, in favor of defendant building owner dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the matter remanded for a new trial.
STEVE D. BYOUN, for plaintiff-appellant.
STEVEN L. SONKIN, for defendant-respondent.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Ellerin, Lerner, JJ.
The trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in bifurcating the trial of this negligence action on the issues of liability and damages. The nature and extent of plaintiff's burns were inextricably intertwined with the question of defendant's liability, thus requiring medical proof to show the causal connection between the subject incident and the injury in order to establish liability (cf., CPLR 603, 4011; cf., Gogatz v. New York City Tr. Auth., 288 A.D.2d 115, 733 N.Y.S.2d 345).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Supreme Court, New York County, for a new trial. Inasmuch as the issues of plaintiff's failure to comply with CPLR 3116 (a) with regard to the deposition of the building superintendent and to disclose timely the identity of the notice witness can be cured by plaintiff's counsel prior to the commencement of the new trial, this Court need not reach the merits of these remaining issues on appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.