Opinion
S00A0035.
DECIDED: JANUARY 31, 2000.
Murder. Grady Superior Court. Before Judge Cato.
Ernie M. Sheffield, for appellant.
J. Brown Moseley, District Attorney, Robert Ray Auman, Chief Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Wylencia H. Monroe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
A jury found Nathaniel Shazer guilty of the malice murder of his wife and of possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court entered its judgments of conviction on the jury's verdicts, and sentenced Shazer to life imprisonment on the murder charge and to a five-year consecutive term for the firearm possession offense, and he appeals.
The murder occurred on or about December 17, 1997. The grand jury returned its indictment on March 17, 1998. The jury found Shazer guilty on October 1, 1998 and, on the same day, the trial court entered the judgments of conviction and sentences. Shazer filed a notice of appeal on October 9, 1998. The case was docketed in this court on September 20, 1999, and the appeal was submitted for decision on November 15, 1999.
Shazer contends only that there was not sufficient evidence to authorize a finding of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Construed most favorably for the State, the evidence shows that Shazer often threatened to kill the victim if she left him, and that he once did so while holding a gun to her head. In the days prior to her death, the victim expressed fear of Shazer and concern that she may die soon. Shazer admitted that he practiced with the pistol daily and knew that it had a bullet in the chamber, but claimed that it discharged accidentally when he was two to four feet away from the victim. However, expert testimony showed that the pistol was held against the victim's chest when it fired, causing her death, and that it would not fire accidentally, but required over 16 pounds of pressure to pull the trigger. "The jury was not required to believe [Shazer's] testimony that the weapon had accidentally discharged." Hayes v. State, 268 Ga. 809, 811 (1) ( 493 S.E.2d 169) (1997). From the State's evidence, a rational trier of fact could have found proof of Shazer's guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Dixson v. State, 269 Ga. 898 (1) ( 506 S.E.2d 128) (1998); Rotino v. State, 259 Ga. 295 (1) ( 380 S.E.2d 261) (1989); Tatum v. State, 259 Ga. 284, 285 (1) ( 380 S.E.2d 253) (1989); Stratton v. State, 257 Ga. 593, 594 (1) ( 362 S.E.2d 47) (1987); Crawford v. State, 256 Ga. 585 (1) ( 351 S.E.2d 199) (1987).
Judgments affirmed. All the Justices concur.