Opinion
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of Tuolumne.
The plaintiffs brought their action for damages for trespass on a mining claim. The jury found a verdict for plaintiffs for $ 500. The defendants moved for a new trial, on the ground, among others, of error in law occurring at the trial and excepted to by defendants, which appears in the opinion of the Court. The motion was granted, and plaintiffs appealed.
COUNSEL
Robinson, Beatty & Sackett, for Appellants.
H. P. Barber, for Respondents.
JUDGES: Mr. Chief Justice Murray delivered the opinion of the Court. Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
OPINION
MURRAY, Judge
This is an appeal from an order of the Court below granting a new trial. The suit was brought to recover damages of the company, for flooding the plaintiffs' claim with water. On the trial of the cause, the Court permitted the plaintiffs to ask one of their witnesses whether individual members of the company had employed him to drive them out of their claims.
This was error; the company was an incorporation and was not bound by the acts or admissions of its members, unless they were acting by its express authority. It is said that this interrogatory was answered in the negative, so that no harm could possibly arise to the defendants from the question. The record does not contain the answer, and it is but justice to presume that the Court below, in view of the whole case, has properly exercised its discretion.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.