From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Wallace

U.S.
Jan 1, 1792
2 U.S. 179 (1792)

Opinion

SEPTEMBER TERM, 1792.


THIS cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New-York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial.

But, BY THE COURT: — It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial.

Rule granted.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Wallace

U.S.
Jan 1, 1792
2 U.S. 179 (1792)
Case details for

Shaw v. Wallace

Case Details

Full title:SHAW versus WALLACE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1792

Citations

2 U.S. 179 (1792)

Citing Cases

Lowe v. Kansas

And from early times the legislature and the courts, in England and America, in order to put a check on…

Allied Chemical v. Alpha Portland Industries

Obviously, the option does not include lands subsequently excavated and thus defendant's position that it is…