From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Kull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1988
141 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 27, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

These four actions arise from a collision between a moped operated by Donna Kull and an automobile operated by Richard Horton at the intersection of Pequash Avenue and Fleetwood Road in the Town of Southold on July 31, 1983. The appellants own a corner lot abutting the intersection where the accident occurred. Donna Kull and Richard Horton claim that they were unable to see each other in time to avoid the accident because of overgrown trees and bushes on the appellants' property.

Summary judgment was properly denied to the appellants. Triable issues of fact exist. Contrary to the appellants' assertions, violation of an ordinance of local government is some evidence of negligence where the injury is a consequence against which the ordinance was intended to protect (see, Long v Forest-Fehlhaber, 55 N.Y.2d 154, 160, rearg denied 56 N.Y.2d 805; O'Leary v American Airlines, 100 A.D.2d 959). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Weinstein and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Kull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1988
141 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Shaw v. Kull

Case Details

Full title:COLLEEN SHAW, an Infant, by Her Guardian, JANET KAZOLAS, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Woznick v. Santora

The appellants' argument that the law only applies to corner lots with concrete curbs is, therefore, without…

Permuy v. City of New York

Proximate cause, which "is no less essential an element of liability because the negligence charged is…