Opinion
April 20, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.H.O.).
Ordering plaintiff to, produce all of the 500,000 photographs in his possession was a proper exercise of discretion, where plaintiff had been given the opportunity to review all of the photographs in defendant's possession, and, up until the time of the orders on appeal, did nothing to dispel defendant's and the Judicial Hearing Officer's belief that he was in possession of only the far lesser number of photographs he had already produced. Inspection of the photographs clearly would be helpful in resolving the parties' conflicting claims of authorship, expressly left unresolved in the motion court's pretrial orders. Plaintiffs reliance on authorities disallowing disclosure after the filing of a note of issue absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances is misplaced in this very unusual action, in which no note of issue was ever filed and disclosure has apparently been conducted only during the course of trial.
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.