From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaten v. American Nat. Bank of Camden

Court of Chancery
Nov 20, 1931
157 A. 128 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Decided November 20th, 1931.

1. To obligate a corporation upon a contract, it must be proven that the contract was its act, either by corporate action, that of an authorized agent, or by adoption and ratification.

2. Evidence examined and found action of the officers to have been ratified by the acceptance of the benefits and proceeds of such action, and with knowledge thereof.

On bill, c.

Mr. Douglas V. Aitken, for the complainant.

Mr. Frank F. Neutze, for the defendant.


Certain officers of the Herman Z. Cutler Company, Incorporated, deposited with the American National Bank of Camden, New Jersey, twenty-five $1,000 gold bonds as collateral for loans then and thereafter made by the bank, the proceeds of which loans were used by the company in the discharge of its obligations, principally for payroll purposes.

It is manifest that the depositing of these bonds was made by the officers without any formal authority of the board of directors. but it is as manifest that all of the directors, with the possible exception of one, knew of the transaction and acquiesced in it.

"To obligate a corporation upon a contract, it must be proven that the contract was its act, either by corporate action, that of an authorized agent, or by adoption and ratification. Ratification will be implied from acquiesence or the acceptance of the benefits of such contract. It is essential to implied ratification that it and the acceptance of benefits be with knowledge of the facts." Feist Feist, Inc., v. A. A. Realty Co. ( Court of Errors and Appeals), 105 N.J. Law 461. See Joseph S. Naame Co. v. Louis Satanov Real Estate and Mortgage Corp., 109 N.J. Eq. 165.

I find that this corporation and the officers and directors thereof ratified the action of the officers who pledged these bonds and that they accepted the benefits and proceeds of the loans with knowledge thereof.

I will advise a decree dismissing the bill.


Summaries of

Shaten v. American Nat. Bank of Camden

Court of Chancery
Nov 20, 1931
157 A. 128 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Shaten v. American Nat. Bank of Camden

Case Details

Full title:H. LOUIS SHATEN, receiver, c., complainant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF…

Court:Court of Chancery

Date published: Nov 20, 1931

Citations

157 A. 128 (N.J. 1931)
157 A. 128

Citing Cases

General Investment Corp. v. Schulman

Under these circumstances, the payee corporation was precluded from questioning the manner in which the note…

Erie R.R. Co. v. S.J. Groves Sons Co.

It may be well to note that it is, also, the well recognized law of this state that ratification may be…