From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shank v. Spruill

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 28, 1969
406 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1969)

Summary

In Shank, for example, the petitioner claimed that Georgia officials forcibly brought him from Florida to Georgia to stand trial for a Georgia offense.

Summary of this case from Raffone v. Sullivan

Opinion

No. 26115.

January 28, 1969.

Keith Laverne Shank, pro se.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.

Sgt. T.H. Spruill and Detective H.G. Wagner, Employees of DeKalb City Police Dept., pro sese.

Before TUTTLE and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and PITTMAN, District Judge.


The petitioner is seeking injunctive and legal redress against the state of Georgia and two DeKalb County policemen. He claims that they forcefully brought him to Georgia from Florida to stand trial for a Georgia offense. He was convicted of the charge and sent to state prison. He later escaped and while out committed a federal offense. He currently is in a federal penitentiary. Georgia officials have filed detainers.

His current action probably is brought under the Civil Rights Acts, most likely 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. His papers do not make that clear. In any case the claim is barred on two grounds. First, there is no statute of limitations in the Civil Rights Act. Therefore, the limitation provision of the states apply. Here that is the Georgia limitation statute, Section 3-1004, which provides a two year period in cases such as this. Also, even if the claim were timely, it would fail because so long as the Georgia conviction stands the arrest must be viewed as proper. He has yet to try Georgia habeas corpus procedures to challenge the arrest and conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Shank v. Spruill

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 28, 1969
406 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1969)

In Shank, for example, the petitioner claimed that Georgia officials forcibly brought him from Florida to Georgia to stand trial for a Georgia offense.

Summary of this case from Raffone v. Sullivan

In Shank v. Spruill, 406 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1969) (per curiam), the court in a very brief opinion held that a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which the plaintiff alleged that two Georgia police officers forcibly brought him back from Florida to Georgia to stand trial was barred by Georgia's statute of limitations.

Summary of this case from Jones v. Bales

In Shank, there was no discussion of the possible application of the Florida limitation statute on the theory that the action might have arisen in that state.

Summary of this case from Jones v. Bales
Case details for

Shank v. Spruill

Case Details

Full title:Keith Laverne SHANK, Appellant, v. Sgt. T.H. SPRUILL and Detective H.G…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 28, 1969

Citations

406 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Bales

Baron Tube Co. v. Transport Ins. Co., 365 F.2d 856, 860 (5th Cir. 1966); Blue v. Maico, 217 F.Supp. 747…

Meadows v. Evans

See Mastracchio v. Ricci, 498 F.2d 1257 (1st Cir. 1974) cert. denied, 420 U.S. 909, 95 S.Ct. 828, 42 L.Ed.2d…