From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seymour v. Seymour

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 28, 1994
661 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-03526.

December 28, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Ray E. Ulmer, Jr., J.

David M. Wall, Clearwater, for appellant.

Marla J. Rosin, Tampa, for appellee.


The husband raises three issues in his appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm on the first two issues and deny review of the third issue.

As to the first and second issues raised by the appellant, we believe the trial court's conclusions were supported by its findings of fact.

The third issue challenges that part of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage which states that the wife is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. The judgment does not set the amount of such fees. Recently, this court aligned itself with the other district courts of appeal, adopting the rule that an order which only determines the right to attorney's fees without setting the amount is a nonappealable nonfinal order. McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part and review denied in part.

THREADGILL and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seymour v. Seymour

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 28, 1994
661 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Seymour v. Seymour

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN J. SEYMOUR, APPELLANT, v. MICHELE L. SEYMOUR, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 28, 1994

Citations

661 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Waggoner v. Waggoner

We affirm, without discussion, as to all remaining issues raised by the parties except that challenging the…

Matthews v. Matthews

Consequently, this issue is not ripe for review. See Brock v. Brock, 695 So.2d 744, 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997);…