From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seymour v. Bank of Am. (In re Seymour)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 4, 2015
601 F. App'x 572 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13-60080 BAP No. 11-1669

05-04-2015

In re: CHARITY M. SEYMOUR, Debtor, CHARITY M. SEYMOUR, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; STEPHEN CHARLES FERLMANN, Attorney, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Markell, Dunn, and Jury, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Charity M. Seymour appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's decision affirming the bankruptcy court's judgment dismissing Seymour's adversary proceeding against her creditor Bank of America. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court's ruling. Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian), 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly dismissed Seymour's adversary proceeding because she lacked standing to prosecute the claims, which arose pre-petition and were accordingly property of the estate. See Estate of Spirtos v. One San Bernardino Cnty. Superior Court Case Numbered SPR 02211, 443 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006) (bankruptcy code endows bankruptcy trustee with exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate); Cusano v. Klein, 264 F.3d 936, 945-47 (9th Cir. 2001) (unscheduled asset continues to belong to estate and does not revert back to debtor when case closes).

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Seymour leave to amend because any amendment would have been futile. See Ditto v. McCurdy, 510 F.3d 1070, 1078-79 (9th Cir. 2007) (stating standard of review); see also Brawders v. County of Ventura (In re Brawders), 503 F.3d 856, 867-68 (9th Cir. 2007) (absent some action by the representative of the bankruptcy estate, liens ordinarily pass through bankruptcy unaffected).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Seymour v. Bank of Am. (In re Seymour)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 4, 2015
601 F. App'x 572 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Seymour v. Bank of Am. (In re Seymour)

Case Details

Full title:In re: CHARITY M. SEYMOUR, Debtor, CHARITY M. SEYMOUR, Appellant, v. BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 4, 2015

Citations

601 F. App'x 572 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Seymour v. Greer (In re Seymour)

See In re Seymour, 2013 WL 1736471. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Panel's decision in May…