From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sexton v. Hayden

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
Aug 24, 2021
No. 14-21-00267-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2021)

Opinion

14-21-00267-CV

08-24-2021

CAROLINA SEXTON, Appellant v. ROSE HAYDEN, Appellee


On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-18498

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 15, 2021. On August 11, 2021, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1). That portion of appellant's motion is granted.

Appellant further requests a return of the funds she deposited with the trial court for the preparation of the clerk's record that were in excess of the actual cost of preparing the clerk's record to date. The bill of costs attached the clerk's record filed with this court on June 11, 2021 reflects that the costs of preparing the record was $191.00. Appellant states in her motion that she deposited $191.00 for the preparation of the clerk's record. There is no excess to return. That portion of appellant's motion is denied.

We dismiss the appeal.


Summaries of

Sexton v. Hayden

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
Aug 24, 2021
No. 14-21-00267-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Sexton v. Hayden

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINA SEXTON, Appellant v. ROSE HAYDEN, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District

Date published: Aug 24, 2021

Citations

No. 14-21-00267-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2021)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Kelly

(Civ. Code, sec. 852, subds. 3, 2215, 2216, 2224, 3395; Brison v. Brison , 75 Cal. 525; 7 Am. St. Rep. 189;…

Koyer v. Willmon

It was gained by the violation of a trust. (Civ. Code, sec. 2224; Rose v. Hayden, 35 Kan. 106, [57 Am. Rep.…