From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sexton v. Eq. L

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1928
162 N.E. 559 (N.Y. 1928)

Opinion

Argued June 19, 1928

Decided July 19, 1928

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Peter C. Mann, Charles W. Pierson and James D. Ewing for appellant.

John J. Finn for respondent.


Judgment of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed, and motion for summary judgment denied, with costs in all courts, on the ground that there are questions of fact presented by the record which ought not to be determined on a motion for summary judgment.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ. Not sitting: CRANE, J.


Summaries of

Sexton v. Eq. L

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1928
162 N.E. 559 (N.Y. 1928)
Case details for

Sexton v. Eq. L

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS SEXTON, Respondent, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 19, 1928

Citations

162 N.E. 559 (N.Y. 1928)
162 N.E. 559

Citing Cases

Killian v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

When the fight is a civil controversy, the arena is the court. Nothing now decided is to be read as affecting…

Falk v. Empire State Degree of Honor

At Special Term the plaintiff has moved, under rules 112 and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary…