From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Service Fin v. Adriatic Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jun 20, 2001
51 S.W.3d 450 (Tex. App. 2001)

Summary

noting that the Insurance Code clearly evinces an intent to protect the premium finance industry

Summary of this case from BankDirect Capital Fin., LLC v. Plasma Fab, LLC

Opinion

No. 10-99-027-CV

Opinion delivered and filed June 20, 2001

Appeal from the 74th District Court, McLennan County, Texas, Trial Court # 90-445-3.

J. Kent Davenport, Leonard Epstein, Newman, Davenport Epstein, P.C., Dallas, for appellant.

David G. Tekell, Malesovas, Martin Tekell, L.L.P., Waco, Riley L. Burnett, Jr., Johnson, Burnett Chang, L.L.P., Houston, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice Davis, Justice Vance, and Justice Gray.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


We decided this appeal in an opinion issued on May 2, 2001. See Service Fin. v. Adriatic Ins. Co., No. 10-99-027-CV, 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2934 (Tex.App.-Waco May 2, 2001, no pet. h.). The parties have since filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In relevant portion, Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

(a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

(2) in accordance with a motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order; but no other party may be prevented from seeking any relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2).

The parties state that they have settled their controversy and ask this Court to dismiss this appeal. However, they do not request that we withdraw our May 2 opinion. Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(c) requires this Court to determine whether we will withdraw the opinion. See id. 42.1(c).

As we have stated on a prior occasion in a similar situation, "[b]ecause our opinion in this case addresses matters of public importance, our duty as a public tribunal constrains us to publish our decision." Polley v. Odom, 963 S.W.2d 917, 918 (Tex.App.-Waco 1998, order, no pet.). Accordingly, we vacate our prior judgment dated May 2, 2001 and substitute in its place a judgment of even date herewith dismissing this appeal. We will not withdraw our prior opinion. See id. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Appeal dismissed


Summaries of

Service Fin v. Adriatic Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jun 20, 2001
51 S.W.3d 450 (Tex. App. 2001)

noting that the Insurance Code clearly evinces an intent to protect the premium finance industry

Summary of this case from BankDirect Capital Fin., LLC v. Plasma Fab, LLC
Case details for

Service Fin v. Adriatic Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SERVICE FINANCE, Appellant v. ADRIATIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Jun 20, 2001

Citations

51 S.W.3d 450 (Tex. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

INAC Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's

Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. Steel, 997 S.W.2d 217, 223 (Tex. 1999). Chapter 24 of the Texas Insurance Code does…

Texas Cityview Care Center, L.P. v. Fryer

Thus, even if the medical power of attorney had become effective, the scope of Griffin's authority would not…