Opinion
No. 19-1177
10-07-2019
SENN FREIGHT LINES INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Louis H. Lang, CALLISON TIGHE & ROBINSON, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Abby C. Wright, Casen B. Ross, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Paul M. Geier, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation and Enforcement, Paula Lee, Senior Trial Attorney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Washington, D.C.; Jim Mullen, Chief Counsel, Sabrina E. Redd, Attorney Advisor, FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Washington, D.C.; Sherri A. Lydon, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:18-cv-00226-TMC) Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis H. Lang, CALLISON TIGHE & ROBINSON, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Abby C. Wright, Casen B. Ross, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Paul M. Geier, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation and Enforcement, Paula Lee, Senior Trial Attorney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Washington, D.C.; Jim Mullen, Chief Counsel, Sabrina E. Redd, Attorney Advisor, FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Washington, D.C.; Sherri A. Lydon, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Senn Freight Lines Inc. appeals the district court's order granting the motion to dismiss its civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Senn Freight Lines Inc. v. United States, No. 8:18-cv-00226-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2018); see also Pornomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 690 (4th Cir. 2016) (concluding district court had no jurisdiction over challenge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2342(3)(A) (2012)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED