From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seniuk v. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1980
78 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

October 6, 1980


In an action to declare that defendant has the duty to defend and indemnify plaintiffs in an action against them for personal injuries, defendant appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 3, 1980, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs summary judgment, (2) a further judgment of the same court, entered February 7, 1980, which awarded plaintiffs attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and (3) stated portions of a resettled judgment of the same court, entered March 24, 1980. Appeal from the judgment entered January 3, 1980 dismissed as academic. That judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Judgment entered February 7, 1980 affirmed, and resettled judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from. Plaintiffs are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. The plaintiff in the underlying action alleged that the Sheriff's Department of Nassau County negligently deprived him of medical care, resulting in an aggravation of his injuries. This constituted an "occurrence" under the insurance policy in question which defines occurrence as "an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which results in bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the Insured" (see McGroarty v Great Amer. Ins. Co., 36 N.Y.2d 358; Matter of Schechter v. State Ins. Fund, 6 N.Y.2d 506). The question of whether the Sheriff's department acted negligently or intentionally should be determined at the trial of the underlying action (see Torcivia v United States Fid. Guar. Co., 52 A.D.2d 944; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Szego, 38 A.D.2d 736; Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dennis, 14 A.D.2d 188). Special Term's award of attorney's fees was reasonable (see Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Dinan, 42 Misc.2d 595). Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seniuk v. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1980
78 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Seniuk v. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SENIUK, Individually and as Sheriff of Nassau County, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1980

Citations

78 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Town of Clarkstown v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co.

Both defendants disclaimed on their respective insurance policies and plaintiff brought this action to…

Matter of Baby Girl

(Matter of Spillane v Katz, 25 N.Y.2d 34, 37.) "Nor", as Judge LEARNED HAND taught us, "is it desirable for a…