From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semac Elec. Co. v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2020
335 Conn. 945 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

09-22-2020

SEMAC ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. v. SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC.

Michael J. Donnelly, Kevin W. Munn and Bruce Meller, pro hac vice, in support of the petition. Louis R. Pepe and Laura W. Ray, in opposition.


Michael J. Donnelly, Kevin W. Munn and Bruce Meller, pro hac vice, in support of the petition.

Louis R. Pepe and Laura W. Ray, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 195 Conn. App. 695, 226 A.3d 1095 (2020), is denied.

KELLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Semac Elec. Co. v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2020
335 Conn. 945 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

Semac Elec. Co. v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SEMAC ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. v. SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 22, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 945 (Conn. 2020)
335 Conn. 944
238 A.3d 19
238 A.3d 17

Citing Cases

Li v. Yaggi

" (Footnote omitted.) Li v. Yaggi , supra, 185 Conn. App. at 699–700, 198 A.3d 123 ; see also Semac Electric…

Centerplan Constr. Co. v. City of Hartford

The city could claim that it was not required to give Centerplan notice and an opportunity to cure because to…