From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sell v. Sell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 28, 2005
928 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-1185.

September 28, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Monroe County, Robert M. Deehl, J.

Edna L. Caruso (West Palm Beach), for appellant.

Rudolph Leacock and Howard M. Rudolph (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before LEVY, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


In this case, the Husband appeals from an Order Clarifying a Final Judgment of Dissolution. Although the Husband argues that several conclusions of the trial court were erroneous, we agree with him on only one. In the Order on appeal, the trial court valued certain of the parties' banking accounts at $377,000 and then divided the amount in half between the parties although the husband had already paid the wife $50,000 out of these accounts pursuant to the parties' prenuptial agreement. Because the Husband had already paid the wife $50,000 from these accounts pursuant to their prenuptial agreement, it was erroneous to value this asset at $377,000 and thus allow the wife to essentially "double dip" from this asset.

On remand, the trial court will need to value the accounts minus the $50,000, and enter an amended final judgment consistent therewith. As to all other points related to the Order, and otherwise, we affirm.


Summaries of

Sell v. Sell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 28, 2005
928 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Sell v. Sell

Case Details

Full title:Louis F. SELL, Appellant, v. Marilyn R. SELL, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 28, 2005

Citations

928 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Valladares v. Junco-Valladares

Consequently, the equitable distribution award of $173,469 partially "allow[s] the wife to essentially double…