From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Selissen v. Empire Bottling Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Feb 15, 1962
180 N.E.2d 324 (Mass. 1962)

Opinion

February 15, 1962.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Louis Kobrin, for the plaintiffs.

John F. Drum, for the defendant.


Exceptions overruled. The female plaintiff, a customer in a provision market, was cut by shattered glass from an exploded bottle of carbonated beverage. The defendant in this action of tort was engaged in the business of bottling and selling soft drinks, some of which were on sale at the market. If it be assumed that the exploded bottle came from the defendant, a verdict was nevertheless rightly directed for it. Even if the excluded answers to interrogatories had been admitted (compare Falzone v. Burgoyne, 317 Mass. 493, 498), the plaintiff did not satisfy the burden of showing that there had been no mishandling after the bottle left the control of the defendant. Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc. 339 Mass. 177, 183.


Summaries of

Selissen v. Empire Bottling Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Feb 15, 1962
180 N.E.2d 324 (Mass. 1962)
Case details for

Selissen v. Empire Bottling Co.

Case Details

Full title:FERDINAND J. SELISSEN another vs. EMPIRE BOTTLING CO., INC

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Feb 15, 1962

Citations

180 N.E.2d 324 (Mass. 1962)
343 Mass. 779

Citing Cases

Smith v. Ariens Co.

Both these lines of cases, however, are distinguishable from negligent design cases. The first line of cases…