From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Selah v. Lavalley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 15, 2014
117 A.D.3d 1261 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-15

In the Matter of Selam SELAH, Petitioner, v. Thomas LAVALLEY, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Selam Selah, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Selam Selah, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of THC. Following a hearing, he was found guilty, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Although this proceeding was improperly transferred, as no issue of substantial evidence was raised in the petition, we will retain jurisdiction and address the merits in the interest of judicial economy ( see Matter of Poe v. Fischer, 107 A.D.3d 1251, 1251 n., 967 N.Y.S.2d 510 [2013] ).

We confirm. Petitioner's claim that he was not provided the underlying reason why he was ordered to submit a urine specimen is without merit. The request for urinalysis form states that the request arose from information provided by a confidential informant, thereby alerting petitioner that he was not selected for a random or routine test ( see Matter of Land v. Fischer, 100 A.D.3d 1170, 1170, 953 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2012] ). Further, inasmuch as the determination of guilt was not based upon the confidential information, the circumstances which resulted in the test were irrelevant ( see id.), and it was unnecessary for the Hearing Officer to assess the credibility of the confidential source ( see Matter of Daniel v. Fischer, 86 A.D.3d 892, 892, 927 N.Y.S.2d 480 [2011];Matter of Stallone v. Fischer, 65 A.D.3d 1410, 1410, 885 N.Y.S.2d 230 [2009],lv. denied13 N.Y.3d 712, 2009 WL 4035641 [2009] ). Petitioner's remaining claims, to the extent that they are properly before us, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Selah v. Lavalley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 15, 2014
117 A.D.3d 1261 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Selah v. Lavalley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Selam SELAH, Petitioner, v. Thomas LAVALLEY, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 15, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 1261 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3569
984 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Toliver v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.Selah v. LaValley, 117…

Laliveres v. Prack

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.Selah v. LaValley, 117…