From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seidman v. Kerr Steamship Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

June, 1926.


Upon defendant's appeal, judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think that plaintiff cannot maintain this action to enforce an attorney's lien without bringing in his former client, the defendant Nelson, by service of summons personally or by publication. ( Oishei v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 101 App. Div. 473; Oishei v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 117 id. 110; affd., 191 N.Y. 544; Oishei v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., No. 1, 110 App. Div. 709. ) Upon plaintiff's appeal, we think the learned trial justice had power to reduce plaintiff's claim, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs. Kelly, P.J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seidman v. Kerr Steamship Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Seidman v. Kerr Steamship Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:J. ARTHUR SEIDMAN, Respondent, Appellant, v. KERR STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1926

Citations

217 App. Div. 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)