From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities Exchange Commission v. Nadel

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Dec 29, 2009
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM.

December 29, 2009


ORDER


Upon due consideration, it is ordered and adjudged that Non-Party Donald H. Rowe's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. 279) is denied for failure to comply with the requirements of Local Rule 3.01(g). In the event Rowe refiles the motion, and because one of the factors this Court must consider is the likelihood of success on appeal, he shall address why the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to hear his appeal inasmuch as he has not been cited for contempt for refusing to honor the Receiver's subpoena. See Branch v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 638 F.2d 873, 877 (5th Cir. 1981) (observing that "[o]rdinarily, the subpoenaed party must either comply with the terms of the subpoena or refuse to do so and contest its validity if he is subsequently cited for contempt for his refusal to obey."). DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida.

The Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decision of the Fifth Circuit decided prior to October 1, 1981. See Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc).


Summaries of

Securities Exchange Commission v. Nadel

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Dec 29, 2009
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Securities Exchange Commission v. Nadel

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 2009)