From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities Exchange Commission v. Anton

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 23, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2274 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2009)

Summary

finding that the fact that insider was aware that increasing loss reserves was a "strong possibility" but was not involved in internal discussions on the issue was insufficient to establish that insider possessed the information

Summary of this case from Securities Exchange Commission v. Rorech

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2274.

April 23, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2009, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Frederick W. Anton, III, and against Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission.


Summaries of

Securities Exchange Commission v. Anton

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 23, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2274 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2009)

finding that the fact that insider was aware that increasing loss reserves was a "strong possibility" but was not involved in internal discussions on the issue was insufficient to establish that insider possessed the information

Summary of this case from Securities Exchange Commission v. Rorech
Case details for

Securities Exchange Commission v. Anton

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. FREDERICK W. ANTON, III

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 23, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2274 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Whitman

Moreover, “the relevant tools” Whitman needed to make his argument on direct review were not merely…

United States v. Smith

United States v. Whitman, 115 F. Supp. 3d 439, 444 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). Arguments about the requirements for…