Summary
In S.E.C. v. Solow, 308 Fed.Appx. 364 (11th Cir. 2009), we affirmed the district court's judgment ordering Jamie L. Solow to pay the S.E.C. $3,424,788 in disgorgement.
Summary of this case from S.E.C. v. SolowOpinion
No. 08-13014.
January 21, 2009.
Carl Francis Schoeppl, Brenda Marie Nelson, Schoeppl Burke, P.A., Boca Raton, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Luis De La Torre, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 06-81041-CV-DMM.
Before, HULL, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.
After review and oral argument, we conclude that the Defendant, Jamie L. Solow, has not shown reversible error in (1) the district court's order, dated March 26, 2008, denying Solow's motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative for a new trial, (2) the district court's order, dated September 10, 2007, granting the Securities Exchange Commission's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, (3) the district court's order, dated May 10, 2007, 2007 WL 1970806, denying Solow's motion to dismiss, (4) the district court's order, dated January 22, 2008, denying Solow's motions in limine, (5) the jury's finding as enumerated on the general verdict form dated January 31, 2008, and (6) the district court's entry of final judgment, dated May 14, 2008, 554 F.Supp.2d 1356, in favor of the SEC.