From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaver v. Railway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Feb 1, 1916
97 A. 220 (N.H. 1916)

Opinion

Decided February 1, 1916.

CASE, for injuries caused by slipping upon icy steps of a car in which the plaintiff in the first action was a passenger. Trial by jury and verdicts for the plaintiffs. Transferred from the May term, 1915, of the superior court, by Branch, J., upon the defendant's exception to the denial of motions for verdicts to be directed.

Charles A. Perkins (by brief and orally), for the plaintiffs.

Jones, Warren, Wilson Manning (Mr. Manning orally), for the defendant.


The defendant claims that verdicts should have been directed because upon one construction of Mrs. Seaver's testimony it could have been found that the steps were "all right." But another and equally legitimate interpretation of her testimony leads to the conclusion that the steps were icy, slippery and dangerous.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.


Summaries of

Seaver v. Railway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Feb 1, 1916
97 A. 220 (N.H. 1916)
Case details for

Seaver v. Railway

Case Details

Full title:BETTY A. SEAVER v. MANCHESTER STREET RAILWAY. GEORGE H. SEAVER v. SAME

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Feb 1, 1916

Citations

97 A. 220 (N.H. 1916)
97 A. 220

Citing Cases

Harlow v. Leclair

In other words, the law recognizes the fact that parties, as well as other witnesses, may honestly mistake…

Goldstein v. Corporation

Fairly interpreted, her testimony meant no more than that she was not consciously aware of any defect in the…