From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcy v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 20, 1926
244 P. 203 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

No. A-5444.

Opinion Filed March 20, 1926.

Appeal from County Court, Blaine County; W.F. Duncan, Judge.

Howard Searcy was convicted of having illegal possession of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Reversed, with instructions.

Ben Smith, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.


Under authority of a search warrant, certain officers forced an entrance into the private residence of the defendant and found in a jar in the kitchen cupboard of defendant less than one-half pint of whisky. There was no evidence of a sale or an attempt to sell whisky. No evidence was offered tending to show that this residence was a place of public resort, a hotel, a rooming house, or a place of storage. A search of a private residence under such circumstances is an unreasonable search, within the meaning both of the state and federal Constitutions touching upon that point, and contrary to section 7013, Comp. Stat. 1921.

The defendant objected to the introduction of this evidence by timely motion to exclude. This motion should have been sustained. Furthermore, the evidence was insufficient to establish illegal intent.

The cause is reversed, with instructions to dismiss.


Summaries of

Searcy v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 20, 1926
244 P. 203 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Searcy v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD SEARCY v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 20, 1926

Citations

244 P. 203 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)
244 P. 203

Citing Cases

Peters v. State

Of course it is useless to remark that the statement made by the county attorney that the officers could…

Oliver v. State

The record discloses that certain officers with a search warrant searched the private residence and…