From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright Machine Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 617 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

holding a prima facie case is made out by proof of the written instrument and a failure to make the payments called for by its terms

Summary of this case from Signature Bank v. Startup Mgmt. Solution, Inc.

Opinion

Submitted June 11, 1971

Decided July 7, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOHN M. MURTAGH, J.

Ralph L. Ellis for Wright Machine Corporation and B.S.F. Company, appellants.

Mel P. Barkan and Murray I. Gurfein for Victor Muscat, appellant.

Stanley Geller for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright Machine Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 617 (N.Y. 1971)

holding a prima facie case is made out by proof of the written instrument and a failure to make the payments called for by its terms

Summary of this case from Signature Bank v. Startup Mgmt. Solution, Inc.
Case details for

Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright Machine Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SEAMAN-ANDWALL CORPORATION, Respondent, v. WRIGHT MACHINE CORPORATION et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1971

Citations

29 N.Y.2d 617 (N.Y. 1971)
324 N.Y.S.2d 410
273 N.E.2d 138

Citing Cases

YZUK v. CIPRIANI ACCESSORIES, INC.

A typical example of an instrument within the meaning of the statute is "a negotiable instrument for the…

Yuzuk v. Cipriani Accessories, Inc.

A typical example of an instrument within the meaning of the statute is "a negotiable instrument for the…