From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seals v. Morris

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 23, 1983
433 So. 2d 686 (La. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-C-0015.

February 23, 1983.


Writ Granted in Part.

The court of appeal, 423 So.2d 652 (La.App. 1982), found that plaintiff Seals had been disabled from working for a substantial period of time, but limited recovery of lost wages prior to trial to 20 weeks (as did the trial court), because the store at which he was employed, had burned 20 weeks after the accident. This holding that "it would be unjust enrichment for plaintiff to recover weekly wages which he would not have been receiving in any event" arbitrarily assumes that plaintiff would not have sought work elsewhere after the fire, without consideration of other relevant factors (such as plaintiff's long-term work record) bearing on the likelihood that, but for this accident, plaintiff would have continued to earn wages.

This item of special damages involves only reparation for wages lost prior to trial and is not covered by the trial court's award of general damages for "past and future mental and physical pain and suffering, any impairment of his earning capacity and any residual injury."

Therefore, the case is remanded to the trial court to fix the amount of lost wages on the basis of proper and nonarbitrary factors and to increase the award accordingly. See Folse v. Fakouri, 371 So.2d 1120 (La. 1979). Otherwise, the writ is denied.

BLANCHE and MARCUS would deny the writ.

WATSON, J., would deny the writ being of the opinion that the total award is within the much discretion accorded the trier of fact.


Summaries of

Seals v. Morris

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 23, 1983
433 So. 2d 686 (La. 1983)
Case details for

Seals v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:SHELLIE J. SEALS v. EUGENE MORRIS, ET AL. SYLVESTER L. HARRY v. EUGENE…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 23, 1983

Citations

433 So. 2d 686 (La. 1983)

Citing Cases

Ozols v. Irving

To recover damages under these articles, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty to the…

McCarthy v. Berman

However, a company cannot purport to provide malpractice insurance by stating that there is coverage and…