From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Women's Med. Group

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 12, 2003
837 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

stating that an order denying a motion for attorney's fees without prejudice is neither a final order nor an appealable non-final order

Summary of this case from Preudhomme v. Bailey

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-4513.

Opinion filed February 12, 2003.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Jean M. Johnson, Judge.

Rodney S. Margol and C. Rufus Pennington, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Ralph O. Anderson, and Mark Hicks, Miami, and Kelly B. Mathis, Jacksonville, for Appellee.


Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order, dated December 3, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees, dated October 10, 2002, is neither a final order nor a nonfinal order appealable pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 9.130(a)(4) (2002).

Final attorney's fees orders are appealable as separate final judgments. See Saye v. Pieschacon, 750 So.2d 759, 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); BDO Seidman, L.L.P. v. British Car Auctions, Inc., 789 So.2d 1019, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). However, the order being appealed is not a final attorney's fee order, because it denies the appellants' motion without prejudice to revisit the issue in the same suit when the Supreme Court resolves the conflict. See Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Additionally, an order that purports to become final at a later date is not final. See, e.g. United Water Florida, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 728 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

The instant order is not an appealable nonfinal order under rule 9.130(a)(4), because it contemplates a future final order, either granting or denying the appellants' motion with finality, at which point the appellants will have the right to appeal that final order. See Craven v. Skate N Space, Inc., 691 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Century Construction Corp., 656 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Scott v. Women's Med. Group

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 12, 2003
837 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

stating that an order denying a motion for attorney's fees without prejudice is neither a final order nor an appealable non-final order

Summary of this case from Preudhomme v. Bailey

noting that the order denying attorney's fees was not final and appealable because it denied the motion without prejudice to the appellant revisiting the issue after a final judgment was entered

Summary of this case from Fabing v. Eaton
Case details for

Scott v. Women's Med. Group

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE SCOTT, by and through her parents and natural guardians, Daryl…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 12, 2003

Citations

837 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Fabing v. Eaton

Generally, an order denying a motion for attorney's fees is a final, appealable order when that order ends…

Yampol v. Turnberry Isle S. Condo. Ass'n, Inc.

However, an order denying a motion for attorney's fees is not a final and appealable order when the trial…