From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 2, 2016
No. 5:08-CR-00023-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2016)

Opinion

No. 5:08-CR-00023-F-1 No. 5:14-CV-00308-F

02-02-2016

ANTONIO DONTEZ SCOTT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Government's Motion to Reconsider [DE-49]. The Government notes that it does not ask the court to revisit its ultimate conclusion or its decision to dismiss Scott's motion. Id. at 1. The Government asks the court to reconsider its finding that Descamps v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013), is not retroactively applicable on collateral review. Mem. Supp. Mot. Reconsider [DE-50] at 1. The Government contends that it did not raise a non-retroactivity defense based on Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). Id. at 2.

In this case, the court raised the issue of Descamps's retroactivity sua sponte. The court may raise retroactivity sua sponte. Robinson v. United States, Nos. 4:10-cr-559-RBH-1, 4:14-cv-364-RBH, 2015 WL 1524406, at 6 n. 4 (D.S.C. April 3, 2015) (citing Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198, 205-06 (2006); United States v. Coleman, 219 F. App'x 139, 141 (3d Cir. 2007)). Consequently, the Government's Motion to Reconsider [DE-49] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

This the 2 day of February, 2016.

/s/_________

James C. Fox

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Scott v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 2, 2016
No. 5:08-CR-00023-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Scott v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO DONTEZ SCOTT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

No. 5:08-CR-00023-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2016)