From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Patten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 1951
278 App. Div. 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

September 19, 1951.


Appeal from Supreme Court, Sullivan County. We think the discretion of the court below was improvidently exercised. Undoubtedly the actions should be consolidated, but the defendant in Action No. 1 has produced overwhelming proof of the convenience of material and necessary witnesses who reside in the County of Cortland. The order is modified by reversing that portion which denied the defendant's motion in Action No. 1 to change the place of trial from Sullivan County to Cortland County, and such motion is granted. In all other respects the order is affirmed. The defendant in Action No. 1 may have $20 costs on appeal, with disbursements. Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Patten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 1951
278 App. Div. 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Scott v. Patten

Case Details

Full title:FRANK I. SCOTT, Respondent, v. LELAND VAN PATTEN, Appellant. (Action No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Young

In the instant case the Commonwealth is not a party to the proceeding and is in no way affected by the…