From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. P. Lorillard Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Dec 3, 1931
157 A. 388 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Argued May 27th, 1931.

Decided December 3d 1931.

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery.

Messrs. McCarter English ( Mr. Robert H. McCarter, of counsel), and Mr. John H. Bocock, of the Virginia bar (on the brief), for the respondents.

Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Skinner ( Mr. Merrit Lane, Mr. Shelton Pitney and Mr. Mahlon Pitney, of counsel), for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed. The reasons for our determination are as stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 108 N.J. Eq. 153; except, however, as to such part thereof as expresses an apprehension that the passage of the disputed by-law by the stockholders was beyond their jurisdiction and was an encroachment on the powers of the board of directors. The vice-chancellor's observations in that respect are not essential to the conclusion reached and as to them we reserve opinion.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 9.

For reversal — CAMPBELL, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 3.


Summaries of

Scott v. P. Lorillard Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Dec 3, 1931
157 A. 388 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Scott v. P. Lorillard Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. SCOTT, JR., et al., complainant-respondent, v. P. LORILLARD…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Dec 3, 1931

Citations

157 A. 388 (N.J. 1931)
157 A. 388

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Hill

In the case of Griffing Iron Co., 63 N.J.L. 168; 41 A. 931, affirmed in the Court of Errors and Appeals on…

Rogers v. Hill

Under such circumstances the courts do not and should not refuse to consider whether a bonus plan is fair or…