From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Aug 3, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-cv-186-TBM-BWR (S.D. Miss. Aug. 3, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-cv-186-TBM-BWR

08-03-2022

MONIQUE SCOTT PLAINTIFF v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED DEFENDANT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TAYLOR B. MCNEEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on submission of the Report and Recommendation [40] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on July 5, 2022. Judge Walker recommends that the Plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing an objection has expired.

“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 addition (citations omitted); see Casas v. Aduddell, 404 Fed.Appx. 879, 881 (5th Cir. 2010) (affirming district court's dismissal of Section 1983 claims and stating that “[w]hen a party fails timely to file written objections to the magistrate judge's proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation, that party is barred from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed findings and conclusions which the district court accepted, except for plain error”) (citing Douglass v. United Serv. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)); Douglass, 79 F.3d at 1430 (affirming district court's grant of summary judgment). Having considered Judge Walker's Report and Recommendation, the Court finds neither is clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [40] entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on July 5, 2022, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Scott v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Aug 3, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-cv-186-TBM-BWR (S.D. Miss. Aug. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Scott v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MONIQUE SCOTT PLAINTIFF v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 3, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-cv-186-TBM-BWR (S.D. Miss. Aug. 3, 2022)