From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Court

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 31, 1951
101 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1951)

Opinion

No. 32717

Decided October 31, 1951.

Prohibition — Writ not available as substitute for appeal.

IN PROHIBITION.

The plaintiffs, by this action in prohibition originating in this court, seek to prevent the defendant Municipal Court of Cleveland from enforcing its order enjoining plaintiffs from prosecuting their respective claims in an action pending in the Common Pleas Court of Guernsey County and involving the same subject matter as that involved in an action pending in the defendant court, in which latter action the injunction was issued.

The petition alleges in substance that plaintiff Scott filed a petition in the Common Pleas Court of Guernsey County and at the time there was pending in the Municipal Court of Cleveland an action by one Diehm, a defendant herein; that both suits are against an insurance company to collect the proceeds of the same life insurance policy; that after the petition in the Guernsey county case was filed, plaintiff Scott was made a party to the action in the Cleveland Municipal Court; and "that the defendant, Municipal Court of Cleveland, was wholly without jurisdiction and authority to issue said injunction or to determine said case by reason of the fact that the action pending in the Common Pleas Court of Guernsey County, Ohio, was prior to the action in the Municipal Court of Cleveland in that the action in the Common Pleas Court in Guernsey county contained additional parties therein to that in the Municipal Court of Cleveland."

Defendants filed separate demurrers to the petition, based on the ground that the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Messrs. Scott Scott, for plaintiffs.

Messrs. Squire, Sanders Dempsey, Mr. Edwin H. Chaney, Messrs. Klein, Diehm Farber and Messrs. Deselm Moore, Mr. Joseph H. Crowley, law director, and Mr. James M. McSweeney, for defendants.


The plaintiffs, not having availed themselves of the usual and adequate remedy of appeal, may not resort to the extraordinary remedy of prohibition as a substitute therefor. State, ex rel. Nicklaus, v. McClelland, Judge, 132 Ohio St. 447, 8 N.E.2d 565; Shafer v. Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, 137 Ohio St. 429, 30 N.E.2d 811; State, ex rel. Ellis, v. McCabe et al., Judges, 138 Ohio St. 417, 35 N.E.2d 571; State, ex rel. Levy, v. Savord, 143 Ohio St. 451, 55 N.E.2d 735; State, ex rel. Miller, v. Court of Common Pleas of Lake County, 151 Ohio St. 397, 86 N.E.2d 464; State, ex rel. Clary, v. Probate Court of Preble County, 151 Ohio St. 497, 86 N.E.2d 765; State, ex rel. Sparto, v. Juvenile Court of Darke County, 153 Ohio St. 64, 90 N.E.2d 598; State, ex rel. Hough, v. Municipal Court of Cleveland, 153 Ohio St. 287, 91 N.E.2d 506.

The demurrers to the petition are sustained and a writ of prohibition is denied.

Writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Court

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 31, 1951
101 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1951)
Case details for

Scott v. Court

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT, ADMR., ET AL. v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF CLEVELAND ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 31, 1951

Citations

101 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1951)
101 N.E.2d 387

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. v. Solether

In a long line of cases this court has consistently held that the function of the extraordinary remedy of…

State ex Rel. v. C.P. Court

"2. A writ of prohibition will be awarded only where there is no other adequate remedy, and, where a court…