From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Conley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Aug 11, 2016
Case No. 2:15-CV-371-DN-PMW (D. Utah Aug. 11, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-CV-371-DN-PMW

08-11-2016

JOHN ELIAS SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. KEITH CONLEY, ANDREA PENA, ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND EAGLE VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

The Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on July 18, 2016 recommends that: all claims against Eagle Valley Elementary School be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that Eagle Valley Elementary be dismissed from the action. Additionally, it is recommended that claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242; claims for malicious prosecution; and claims against any entity under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further recommended that Plaintiff Scott be given leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the substantive defects in the remaining causes of action of the original complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this order.

The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 . As of the date of this Order, no party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation as provided by rules of court. Therefore, the analysis and conclusion of the magistrate judge are accepted and the Report and Recommendation is adopted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and all claims against Eagle Valley Elementary School are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Eagle Valley Elementary is dismissed from the action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: (1) claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, (2) claims for malicious prosecution, and (3) claims against any entity under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Scott is granted leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the substantive defects in the remaining causes of action of the original complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case with prejudice.

Signed August 11, 2016.

BY THE COURT

/s/_________

District Judge David Nuffer

Docket no. 28, filed July 18, 2016.


Summaries of

Scott v. Conley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Aug 11, 2016
Case No. 2:15-CV-371-DN-PMW (D. Utah Aug. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Scott v. Conley

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ELIAS SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. KEITH CONLEY, ANDREA PENA, ALPINE SCHOOL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Aug 11, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:15-CV-371-DN-PMW (D. Utah Aug. 11, 2016)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Utah Dep't of Agric. & Food

Id.Scott v. Conley, No. 2:15-CV-00371, 2016 WL 4257507, at *8 (D. Utah July 18, 2016), R. and R. adopted, No.…