From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Cellco Partnership

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 2, 2009
312 F. App'x 436 (2d Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-2708-CV.

March 2, 2009.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the district court judgment is AFFIRMED.

Kitt Scott, New York, NY, pro se.

Raymond G. McGuire, Harlan Silverstein, Lisa E. Dayan, Kauff McClain McGuire LLP, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. AMALYA L. KEARSE, Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, and Hon. JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge.

The Honorable Joseph F. Bianco, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.


SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Kitt Scott, pro se, appeals from the April 11, 2002 memorandum and order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (McKenna, J.) granting partial summary judgment and the May 31, 2007 judgment entered in favor of the defendant-appellee after a jury found in its favor on all claims. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case.

After having reviewed Scott's contentions on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion of April 11, 2002, and rulings. We find no error in the trial court's procedural or evidentiary rulings or in its instructions to the jury. We have considered all of Scott's arguments and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Scott v. Cellco Partnership

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 2, 2009
312 F. App'x 436 (2d Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Scott v. Cellco Partnership

Case Details

Full title:Kitt SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a/ Verizon…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 2, 2009

Citations

312 F. App'x 436 (2d Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Purdie v. City Univ. of N.Y.

CUNY cites cases holding that "close monitoring, without more" is not a materially adverse action under the…