From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 9, 1913
137 P. 113 (Okla. 1913)

Summary

In Scott v. Brown, 40 Okla. 184, 137 P. 113, we said that if the defendant is a minor under the age of fourteen years, the summons in the commencement of the action shall be served on the minor and his guardian, and if over fourteen years, then on the minor; that in either case it is necessary to serve the minor; and that this statute must be strictly followed.

Summary of this case from Frost v. Blockwood

Opinion

No. 2951

Opinion Filed December 9, 1913.

INFANTS — Appeal — Summons in Error — Minors. Where summons in error is issued upon their guardian and not upon the minors, who by their guardian were plaintiffs in the court below, or their attorneys, held, that such service fails to comply with sections 5238 and 4721, Rev. Laws 1910; that the same is insufficient to give the court jurisdiction over the minors, and that the motion to dismiss the proceeding in error will be sustained for want of necessary parties.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from County Court, Johnston County; Nick Wolfe, Judge.

Action by Mildred Brown and others against W. M. Scott and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error. Dismissed.

Harry K. Allen, for plaintiffs in error.

Sigler Howard, for defendants in error.


On February 20, 1911, judgment was rendered and entered herein in the county court. After motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, commenced proceedings in error, and caused summons in error to be issued and served on A. P. Brown, guardian of Mildred Brown, Alice Brown, Wm. G. Brown, and Martin Brown, minors, who, by their said guardian, were plaintiffs below. Come the minors and move the court to dismiss the proceeding, "because no summons in error was ever served upon the defendants in error or their attorneys." Section 5238, Rev. Laws 1910, provides that after the petition in error has been filed in this court "a summons shall issue and be served, or publication made, as in the commencement of an action. A service on the attorney of record in the original case shall be sufficient." Section 4721, Rev. Laws 1910, provides, if the defendant is a minor and under the age of fourteen years, that the summons in the commencement of an action shall be served on the minor and his guardian, and if over fourteen years, then on the minor. In either case it is necessary to serve the minor. This statute must be strictly followed.

The court having acquired no jurisdiction of the minors by proper service, the motion to dismiss is sustained. Bolling et al. v. Campbell, 36 Okla. 671, 128 P. 1091; Fanning v. Foley, 99 Cal. 336, 33 P. 1098; Keys v. McDonald et al., 1 Handy (Ohio) 287; Helms v. Chadbourne, 45 Wis. 60; Ingersoll v. Ingersoll, 42 Miss. 155; Melcher v. Schluter, 5 Neb. (Unof.) 445, 98 N.W. 1083; Campbell v. Laclede Gas Co., 84 Mo. 352; Jones v. Mathews (Miss.) 4 So. 547.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 9, 1913
137 P. 113 (Okla. 1913)

In Scott v. Brown, 40 Okla. 184, 137 P. 113, we said that if the defendant is a minor under the age of fourteen years, the summons in the commencement of the action shall be served on the minor and his guardian, and if over fourteen years, then on the minor; that in either case it is necessary to serve the minor; and that this statute must be strictly followed.

Summary of this case from Frost v. Blockwood

In Scott et al. v. Brown et al., 40 Okla. 184, 137 P. 113, it is held that in bringing a minor into court, the statute providing the method of service must be strictly followed, and that with the application of that doctrine, service on the guardian of a minor of a summons in error was insufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the person of the minor.

Summary of this case from Bruner v. Nordmeyer
Case details for

Scott v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT et al. v. BROWN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 9, 1913

Citations

137 P. 113 (Okla. 1913)
137 P. 113

Citing Cases

Welch v. Welch

By our statute, and generally, an action can only be commenced by or against a minor through his guardian;…

Taylor v. Scott

This was not a sufficient service of summons upon the minor to give the court jurisdiction over the minor in…