Summary
In Scott v. Courtney, 1872, 7 Nev. 419, the Nevada court held that the operator of a licensed gambling casino could not recover his winnings from a party who had gambled in the casino but not paid his losses.
Summary of this case from Berman v. Riverside Casino Corp.Opinion
DOCKET NO. 07-655.
October 9, 2007
ORDER
Before the Court is a "Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Order for Appeal" (doc. #30) filed by defendant, Auto Club Family Insurance Co. wherein the mover seeks to have this Court Certify the Court's Memorandum Ruling and Judgment dated September 10, 2007 as an appealable interlocutory decree pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). The Court's ruling found that the Doyles' refusal to submit to a statement under oath without limitations was not an absolute refusal to submit to a statement under oath. This was a factual finding and not a question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion. Accordingly, it is
Docs. #28 and 29.
ORDERED that motion for certification of an interlocutory order for appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) is hereby DENIED.