From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scoggins v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado.
Mar 5, 2012
271 P.3d 515 (Colo. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10SC15.

2012-03-5

Richard Allen SCOGGINS, Petitioner v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

Court of Appeals Case No. 06CA2230.Douglas K. Wilson, Public Defender, Ellen Kay Eggleston, Deputy Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioner. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Clemmie Parker Engle, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.


Court of Appeals Case No. 06CA2230.Douglas K. Wilson, Public Defender, Ellen Kay Eggleston, Deputy Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioner. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Clemmie Parker Engle, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.

¶ 1 Justice Hobbs, Justice Rice, and Justice Eid are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, People v. Scoggins, 240 P.3d 331, 334 (Colo.App.2009), should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Bender, Justice Coats, and Justice Boatright are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

¶ 2 Because the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(e).

Justice MÁRQUEZ does not participate.


Summaries of

Scoggins v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado.
Mar 5, 2012
271 P.3d 515 (Colo. 2012)
Case details for

Scoggins v. People

Case Details

Full title:Richard Allen SCOGGINS, Petitioner v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado.

Date published: Mar 5, 2012

Citations

271 P.3d 515 (Colo. 2012)
2012 CO 16

Citing Cases

People v. Sinovcic

2008) (“Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.”); People v. Scoggins, 240 P.3d…

People v. Sinovcic

2008) ("Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo."); People v. Scoggins, 240 P.3d…