From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwinger v. Raymond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 19, 1887
105 N.Y. 648 (N.Y. 1887)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Schwinger v Raymond (105 NY 648, 649 [1887]), the Court of Appeals stated that "[t]he court below had the power to set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence without any exception, but in this court we can consider no objection which is not based upon some exception taken at the trial" (emphasis added).

Summary of this case from Evans v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

Argued March 22, 1887

Decided April 19, 1887

D.C. Hyde for appellant.

George M. Osgoodby for respondent.

EARL, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Summaries of

Schwinger v. Raymond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 19, 1887
105 N.Y. 648 (N.Y. 1887)

In Schwinger v Raymond (105 NY 648, 649 [1887]), the Court of Appeals stated that "[t]he court below had the power to set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence without any exception, but in this court we can consider no objection which is not based upon some exception taken at the trial" (emphasis added).

Summary of this case from Evans v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

In Schwinger v. Raymond (105 N.Y. 648) it was said that the General Term has power to set aside a verdict as contrary to evidence, although that power was not possessed by the Court of Appeals.

Summary of this case from Bronson v. N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.

In Schwinger v. Raymond, 105 N.Y. 648, the court said: "The court below had the power to set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence without any exception, but in this court we can consider no objection which is not based upon some exception taken at the trial.

Summary of this case from Briscoe v. Litt
Case details for

Schwinger v. Raymond

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPH SCHWINGER, Respondent, v . ALONZO B. RAYMOND et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 19, 1887

Citations

105 N.Y. 648 (N.Y. 1887)
7 N.Y. St. Rptr. 544
11 N.E. 952

Citing Cases

Van Doren v. Jelliffe

Having omitted to move for a nonsuit or for the direction of a verdict in his favor, defendant has conceded…

Seligman v. Hahn

The cases cited for appellant to the effect that the appellate court may reverse without an objection and…

31 Citing Cases