Opinion
Submitted February 1, 1886
Decided June 1, 1886
A.R. Dyett and Joseph Fettretch for appellants.
Wm. B. Putney for respondents.
RAPALLO, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Schwenk v. Naylor
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1886
102 N.Y. 683 (N.Y. 1886)
Summaries of
Schwenk v. Naylor
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1886
102 N.Y. 683 (N.Y. 1886)
Case details for
Schwenk v. Naylor
Case Details
Full title:SAMUEL K. SCHWENK et al., Appellants, v . ROBERT NAYLOR, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 1, 1886
Citations
102 N.Y. 683 (N.Y. 1886)
2 N.Y. St. Rptr. 477
Citing Cases
Worthington v. Herrmann
"The gravamen of the action (for deceit) is actual fraud, and nothing less will sustain it." ( Kountze v.…
Tschetinian v. City Trust Co.Such cases have obviously no application. Others are cases where false and fraudulent representations were…