From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schweid v. Storandt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 4, 1916
112 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued January 19, 1916

Decided February 4, 1916

Frederick A. Mann for appellant.

George A. Carnahan for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Schweid v. Storandt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 4, 1916
112 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Schweid v. Storandt

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD A. SCHWEID et al., Respondents, v . CARL W. STORANDT, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 4, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1075

Citing Cases

Schweid v. Storandt

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 217 N.Y. 637.)…

Ritchey v. Murphey

His right to compensation was not dependent upon an agreement with a purchaser being actually made, nor upon…