From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwed v. Parks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1961
14 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

October 23, 1961


In a proceeding to substitute attorneys for the plaintiffs in a negligence action for the recovery of damages for injuries to person and property, the discharged attorney appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 17, 1961, granting plaintiffs' motion for substitution, as fixed his fee at 17% of the recovery or settlement plus his disbursements of $189, and as directed that such fee and disbursements be paid out of any recovery or settlement. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. It appears that upon the argument of the motion the retiring or discharged attorney requested a lien for a percentage fee to be fixed by the Special Term immediately without awaiting the outcome of the action, and asked that he be immediately reimbursed for his disbursements. The percentage fee of a retiring or discharged attorney is normally fixed after the recovery. However, when at his request it is fixed at the time of substitution, his subsequent objection upon the ground that the determination was premature will be disregarded. It is customary in negligence cases for disbursements to be repaid out of the proceeds of the recovery ( Matter of Weiss [ Tullman], 196 N.Y.S.2d 255, 261, revd. on other grounds 11 A.D.2d 63). Beldock, Acting P.J., Klenfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schwed v. Parks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1961
14 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Schwed v. Parks

Case Details

Full title:LILLIAN SCHWED et al., Respondents, v. JOHN F. PARKS et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Steves v. Serlin

Of course, any amount owed was limited to disbursements expended, since Julien Schlesinger was retained on a…

Rizzi v. City of New York

Even so, the outgoing attorney agreed to take the risk of recovery in the original retainer, not only as to…